Logo


CommunitiesBreaking News
Consumer
Business
Academia
Government
General
AppRising Blog
KillerApp Sightings
KillerApp Research

About Us

[an error occurred while processing this directive]





Government : Profile Last Updated: Aug 9th, 2007 - 13:22:15

Taking the High Way to Traffic Management
By Kassandra Kania
Aug 15, 2006, 15:47


Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Digg!
Bookmark to del.ico.us

High-speed networks allow the California Department of Transportation to measure traffic performance across the entire state.

More than 45,000 miles of highway and freeway lanes crisscross California, and Caltrans – the California Department of Transportation – is responsible for managing every one of them. To measure the performance of this vast network of roadways, the agency must determine how much delay drivers encounter, compared to free-flow traffic conditions. 

Approximately 23,000 sensors or loop detectors buried in the freeways measure the number of cars that pass every 30 seconds, as well as the average time that a vehicle is present over the loop. This data is transmitted to each district’s Traffic Management Center (TMC) over a variety of networks.

Finding Common Ground

When the sensors were first installed, no centralized system existed to collect and process the TMC data. Each district reported its data to Caltrans headquarters using inconsistent measurement methods. There was no way to compare data from one district to another, and therefore no unified view of what was taking place on the freeways. Without a standard performance metric, Caltrans could not measure and report conditions that involved two or more districts.

The lack of a centralized system also made performance monitoring labor intensive. “Historically, we’ve been doing much of the work manually and using paper reports,” says Caltrans operations manager Bob Ratcliff. Traffic engineers accessed data from the systems that are used for traffic signals and changeable message signs. Caltrans also sent vehicles out to conduct tachometer runs several times a year. Speeds, travel times and other data were then aggregated into annual reports. “We tried to be representative of what was occurring on the freeways [under normal circumstances], so we’d shoot for weekdays rather than holidays,” explains Ratcliff. 

In 1999, Caltrans began to centralize its processing and analysis of loop detector data, using a new Performance Measurement System (PeMS). PeMS was designed at the University of California, Berkeley, where Caltrans and the university’s Institute of Transportation Studies maintain an ongoing collaboration known as California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH).
 

PeMS at Work

image2
Copyright 2001 California Department of Transportation
To improve the measurement of freeway performance, Caltrans began to implement PeMS in stages. The system was introduced in urban areas, such as Los Angeles, and slowly moved into other urban areas. At present, nine out of 12 districts collect real-time data, which are transmitted to the PeMS Oracle database over Caltrans’ high-speed WAN. (The WAN is also used to transmit very large engineering and geographic information files.)

“Using this high-speed network, Caltrans is able to transport massive amounts of data throughout the state to one location,” says Karl Petty, PeMS architect and CEO, Berkeley Transportation Systems Inc. “PeMS takes the raw lane-by-lane data and performs algorithms that allow engineers to look at freeway performance over long periods of time. They can determine which freeways are improving and which ones are getting worse and then decide what kind of management strategy is needed to reduce delays on that particular freeway section.”

Users access PeMS reports over the Internet through a Web browser. System planners can pinpoint bottlenecks and determine whether they can be alleviated by improving operations or by minor capital improvements. Ratcliff recalls a manager who encountered a bottleneck at a ramp while driving. Using PeMS, he was able to determine that the bottleneck originated in a different location from what he had expected. “It was helpful in doing analysis and taking that to the decision makers  to show them what was taking place,” says Ratcliff.

Recently, Caltrans added dashboard tabs, which managers are starting to use more frequently. “This is a quick way for them to understand day by day what’s going on in their district,” says Ratcliff. For instance, the dashboard displays yesterday’s top bottlenecks. Managers and traffic engineers can examine the location of these bottlenecks and conduct research into possible causes.

Another popular link is the congestion pie, which displays in pie-chart format the causes of congestion by geographic region. “Managers, traffic engineers and researchers use this for corridor management and planning,” says Ratcliff. “They’ll find causality and then do everything from looking at PeMS aerials and photo logs to driving around in order to drill down deeper.”

image2
Copyright 2000 California Department of Transportation
One of PeMS’ most measurable successes has been diagnosing faulty loop detectors. The detector health link allows managers to determine the percentage of good loops by district and then drill down further to determine which loops are faulty and the possible cause of the problem. Once the information is relayed to the district, maintenance workers are dispatched to the loops to repair them.

“Six to nine months ago, the average detector health was around 50%,” says Ratcliff. “Since PeMS has been implemented, we’ve raised detector health to an average of 74%.”

PeMS also receives real-time incident data from the California Highway Patrol (CHP). In conjunction with a historical accident database, this information is used in safety analyses.

Looking Down the Road

Since PeMS’ inception, districts have continued to fold in their data. The most recent, District 10, began sending data to PeMS several months ago. And while tachometer runs are becoming more sophisticated with the use of GPS, eventually the agency hopes to phase them out completely, says Ratcliff. The bottom line: “PeMS does a better job.” But for now there is talk of incorporating data from the tachometer runs into PeMS – a task that would require an algorithm adjustment, since the GPS tachometer runs capture real-time location data every 60 seconds.

Early in 2006, Caltrans began moving PeMS in house from UC Berkeley. The California Center for Innovative Transportation (CCIT) at UC Berkeley is leading an initiative to install computer and networking hardware that will allow Caltrans to host its own copy of the software. CCIT is also offering outreach sessions and training courses to Caltrans personnel to promote awareness of PeMS. “We want get as many people aware of PeMS as possible so they can use the system,” says Erik Alm, CCIT senior development engineer. “PeMS provides much better performance data on the highway systems, and we expect it will have benefits for everyone.”


© 2006 Copyright by KillerApp

Top of Page

Profile
Latest Headlines
Online Democracy: Engaging Citizens with Video Meetings
Fort Wayne Embraces Digital Diagnosis
Taking the High Way to Traffic Management